<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bounce Rate is NOT a Factor in Quality Score</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ppc.org/bounce-rate-is-not-a-factor-in-quality-score/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ppc.org/bounce-rate-is-not-a-factor-in-quality-score/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2013 23:29:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Rampton</title>
		<link>http://ppc.org/bounce-rate-is-not-a-factor-in-quality-score/#comment-9797</link>
		<dc:creator>John Rampton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 15:06:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ppc.org/?p=9999#comment-9797</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Couldn&#039;t agree more!  I wish it was cause people with crappy landing pages are getting high qs&#039;s and us people who are creating an amazing experience aren&#039;t getting as much benefit for it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Couldn&#8217;t agree more!  I wish it was cause people with crappy landing pages are getting high qs&#8217;s and us people who are creating an amazing experience aren&#8217;t getting as much benefit for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tally</title>
		<link>http://ppc.org/bounce-rate-is-not-a-factor-in-quality-score/#comment-9490</link>
		<dc:creator>Tally</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 17:04:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ppc.org/?p=9999#comment-9490</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My guess: the main reason Bounce Rate isn&#039;t included is that it requires Google tags to be implemented on the site. Since these tags aren&#039;t REQUIRED for participation in AdWords, they can&#039;t use this metric to calculate QS. 

However, I would definitely vote for its inclusion as a measure of a quality customer experience if it was publicly available.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My guess: the main reason Bounce Rate isn&#8217;t included is that it requires Google tags to be implemented on the site. Since these tags aren&#8217;t REQUIRED for participation in AdWords, they can&#8217;t use this metric to calculate QS. </p>
<p>However, I would definitely vote for its inclusion as a measure of a quality customer experience if it was publicly available.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Rampton</title>
		<link>http://ppc.org/bounce-rate-is-not-a-factor-in-quality-score/#comment-7183</link>
		<dc:creator>John Rampton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 18:32:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ppc.org/?p=9999#comment-7183</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great response.  I stand firm to my answer though... here is why.  Bounce rate can change and will change.  When it goes down and the user has a better experience the Quality Score should go up.  If it&#039;s got a horrible bounce rate and the experience is bad, it shouldn&#039;t be as high.  

I agree with you about being punished for a not attractive enough landing page.  But once you make it better and more attractive your quality score would go up wouldn&#039;t it?  It&#039;s kinda like we&#039;re saying the same thing.  I just don&#039;t want my ads showing if I have a horrible landing page (which I never do!) but still.  I&#039;d rather it be a factor in there then speed, cause I think it&#039;s way more important that speed and a variety of other factors.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great response.  I stand firm to my answer though&#8230; here is why.  Bounce rate can change and will change.  When it goes down and the user has a better experience the Quality Score should go up.  If it&#8217;s got a horrible bounce rate and the experience is bad, it shouldn&#8217;t be as high.  </p>
<p>I agree with you about being punished for a not attractive enough landing page.  But once you make it better and more attractive your quality score would go up wouldn&#8217;t it?  It&#8217;s kinda like we&#8217;re saying the same thing.  I just don&#8217;t want my ads showing if I have a horrible landing page (which I never do!) but still.  I&#8217;d rather it be a factor in there then speed, cause I think it&#8217;s way more important that speed and a variety of other factors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jenny</title>
		<link>http://ppc.org/bounce-rate-is-not-a-factor-in-quality-score/#comment-6804</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2013 21:20:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ppc.org/?p=9999#comment-6804</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great job on getting the most reliable answer from the source!
I would have to disagree with you, John, on why it makes sense. Bounce rate could mean that an LP was not a well optimized and not attractive enough, that is smth the advertiser needs to work on, but that would only be unfair if Google &quot;punished&quot; for it. It&#039;s about competition after all, not all websites are created equally beautiful, and it only gives a webmaster a room for improvement.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great job on getting the most reliable answer from the source!<br />
I would have to disagree with you, John, on why it makes sense. Bounce rate could mean that an LP was not a well optimized and not attractive enough, that is smth the advertiser needs to work on, but that would only be unfair if Google &#8220;punished&#8221; for it. It&#8217;s about competition after all, not all websites are created equally beautiful, and it only gives a webmaster a room for improvement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

 Served from: ppc.org @ 2013-06-19 10:19:29 by W3 Total Cache -->